Does kinesiology tape work? What the sham tape trials found

What the tape is supposed to do, and what is actually known

Kinesiology tape is a stretchy cotton strip with an adhesive on one side, stuck over a sore area under some amount of tension. The story sold with it is that the stretch lifts the skin slightly away from what is underneath, and that this lifting decompresses tissue, drains fluid toward the lymph nodes and changes how the muscle underneath behaves.

That explanation is not a research finding. It is the marketing, and when a UK advertiser was asked to prove it in 2012, the regulator read 23 submitted reports and decided that not one of them stood up as evidence for how the tape was supposed to work (Advertising Standards Authority, 2012). The theory is still the one printed on the box.

What has been measured is narrower and more useful: whether a taped knee, heel, shoulder or elbow hurts less, moves further and works better than an untaped one, and whether it beats a strip of the same tape applied in a way that should not produce any of those effects. That second comparison is the one this page is built on, and it is the one most pages about tape leave out.

That matters because of everything else that changes when you stick something on a painful knee. You can feel it there. You know you have done something about the problem. The person who applied it spent ten minutes attending to your knee.

Pain is sensitive to all of that, which is why a trial comparing tape with nothing tells you very little, and a trial comparing tape with fake tape tells you a great deal.

A fake, or sham, application uses the same tape on the same skin, cut and stuck in a pattern that the theory says should do nothing: no stretch, the wrong direction, or away from the structure it is meant to support. The person wearing it gets the same sensation, the same attention and the same belief. What they do not get is the specific thing you are paying for.

There is nothing foolish about having bought a roll. It is cheap, it is on the shelf in a supermarket or a pharmacy, and for some problems the trials do find a short-term difference. The question worth answering is which claims survive the fake tape comparison and which do not.

Does kinesiology tape work for knee pain?

For an arthritic knee, yes, a little, and only for a while. This is the body area with the most sham controlled evidence behind it.

A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis pooled 16 randomized trials of tape used without any accompanying physical therapy in knee osteoarthritis, searching five databases up to March 2025, and its pain comparisons are against sham tape rather than against no tape. After treatment, pain at rest was lower in the taped groups by a mean difference of -0.75 (95% confidence interval -1.15 to -0.34) and pain during movement by -0.92 (-1.65 to -0.20). The total WOMAC score, which combines pain, stiffness and function, improved by -0.60 (-1.19 to -0.01). Knee flexion range went up by 6.04 degrees (3.13 to 8.96), while extension range did not move and long-term pain showed no significant effect at all (Aldalati and colleagues, 2025).

Read the pattern rather than the individual numbers. Small, real, short-lived, and gone by the time anyone measured again. The abstract does not name the pain scale behind those mean differences, so treat them as the trials' own scales and judge the direction instead of converting them into something they are not.

Patellofemoral pain, the kind felt around or behind the kneecap on stairs and squats, has its own small review and a finding worth sitting with. Five studies in athletes were pooled in 2026. The pain effect size came out at -1.71 and the function effect size at 1.06, both with p values sitting exactly on 0.05. Two of the authors' own observations matter more than those borderline figures: the benefit was strongest when taping was added to exercise therapy, and rigid taping outperformed the stretchy kind (Khan and colleagues, 2026). That is athletes rather than the general reader, and it is the first of several places on this page where the stiff tape does better than the elastic one.

For the tendon below the kneecap, the honest comparison has already been run on this site. In one randomized trial, a patellar strap and sports tape both reduced pain on a loaded knee bend compared with no support, and neither of them beat placebo tape, which did the same job (de Vries and colleagues, 2016). Our page on straps and braces for jumper's knee goes through that trial properly, and the loading program it points at lives on the patellar tendinopathy page. If your knee pain sits on the outside rather than the front, outer knee pain covers what else it tends to be, and runner's knee is the running version of the kneecap problem.

Does kinesiology tape work for plantar fasciitis and heel pain?

Taping a painful heel has the strongest short-term result on this page, and it also has the firmest guideline support, which is an unusual combination for a treatment this cheap.

A randomized study published in 2024 taped 34 people with plantar fasciitis, 17 with the real application and 17 with sham tape, and recorded pain on a visual scale every day through the fifth day of wear and again 24 hours after removal. The largest gap between the groups was 3.5 points, at the two day assessment, and it narrowed from there. Time, group, and the interaction between the two were all significant at p below 0.001, and the authors' practical conclusion was that pain falls from the first day and the tape can be worn for up to 5 days (Garcia-Gomariz and colleagues, 2024). Thirty-four people is a small trial, so hold the result loosely and note that it is a genuine sham comparison, which is more than most of this literature manages.

The American physical therapy clinical practice guideline for plantar heel pain agrees with that use and is specific about the limits of it. Foot taping, rigid or elastic, is recommended alongside other physical therapy for short-term pain and function, on strong evidence (Koc and colleagues, 2023). Two words in that sentence do the work: alongside, and short-term. The guideline puts manual therapy and plantar fascia and calf stretching at the same strength, and resistance training for the foot and ankle muscles one rung below, which is where the lasting change comes from.

So for a heel, tape is a reasonable thing to use in the first week or two while the slower work gets going, and our plantar fasciitis program is that slower work. If the worst part of your day is the first few steps out of bed, heel pain in the morning explains why. If the sore spot sits at the back of the heel rather than underneath it, the problem is probably Achilles tendinopathy, where the comparable question is about footwear instead, and shoes and heel lifts answers that one.

Shoulder, elbow, shin and back: what the trials found in each place

The evidence is not the same strength in every body part, and the useful answer depends on which one you came for.

The shoulder has the most thorough review of the lot, and the least encouraging result. A Cochrane review of kinesiology taping for rotator cuff disease collected 23 trials in 1,054 participants, of which 9 trials in 312 participants compared tape with sham tape. At 4 weeks, overall pain on a 0 to 10 scale was 3.03 in the taped groups against 2.96 with sham, an absolute difference of 0.7% in favor of the sham. Function on a 0 to 100 scale improved by an absolute 8%, with an interval running from 21% better to 5% worse, and pain on movement improved by an absolute 14.8%, which the reviewers noted was not clinically important. Every one of those outcomes was graded very low certainty, and the authors' summary is that the evidence seems to demonstrate little or no benefit (Gianola and colleagues, 2021).

None of those figures rests on all nine sham controlled trials. Each outcome comes from 2 to 6 of them, so the shoulder evidence is thinner than a review of 23 trials sounds.

A newer meta-analysis of 16 trials in 890 people with shoulder tendinopathy is a shade warmer and lands in the same place. Tape added to other treatment beat tape used alone for pain, by a standardized difference of -0.39 (-0.56 to -0.23), with range of motion gains of roughly 6 to 12 degrees in different directions. Ten of its 16 trials were at high risk of bias, certainty was very low for pain, range and function, and the authors position tape as a short-term add-on rather than a treatment (Wang and colleagues, 2026). For what the shoulder problem itself needs, see our rotator cuff tendinopathy program, the related shoulder impingement page, or shoulder pain when lifting your arm if you are not sure which you have.

One shoulder population is the exception in this whole literature. In 12 trials of taping the paralyzed arm after a stroke, pain intensity improved with a standardized difference of -0.79 (-1.39 to -0.19) and shoulder subluxation by -0.50 (-0.80 to -0.20), both of them larger and more consistent than anything the general shoulder reviews found (Wang and colleagues, 2022). That is a hospital rehabilitation population with a hemiplegic shoulder being taped by a clinician, and it says nothing about a strip bought for a sore shoulder at the gym.

The elbow is where the stiff tape wins on paper. The American clinical practice guideline for lateral elbow pain supports rigid taping for immediate and short-term relief in an irritable elbow, meaning one that flares easily, at grade B, moderate evidence on its own scale. The same guideline does cover the stretchy kind and puts it a rung lower: kinesiology tape inside a program of several treatments, at grade C, which on that scale means weak evidence (Lucado and colleagues, 2022).

Elastic tape has a meta-analysis of its own, 5 trials in 168 people, reporting better pain, grip strength, Mayo index and DASH scores with no difference in adverse events (Zhong and colleagues, 2020), and a commentary in the same journal immediately asked whether the effect was more than a placebo (Lin and Zhu, 2020). A network meta-analysis of 27 trials published in 2026 found tape ahead of placebo at 1 to 4 weeks and at 4 to 12 weeks, and then found nothing at all beating placebo beyond 12 weeks, for any of the treatments it ranked (Ouyang and colleagues, 2026). Our tennis elbow page carries the loading program and where taping sits beside it.

Shin splints come up constantly in the search suggestions and have almost nothing behind them. A systematic review found 4 studies, rated them poor to moderate, and concluded that the efficacy of the tape here is not clear (Guo and colleagues, 2022). The best known of those measured the rate of loading under the foot on a pressure mat in 40 walkers rather than asking whether anything hurt less, and had no sham arm (Griebert and colleagues, 2016). A separate trial of 40 people found tape better than standard orthotics for pain and hop distance (Kachanathu and colleagues, 2018), which compares it with a different product rather than with a fake version of itself.

One more study is worth a line of its own. In 24 healthy elite athletes taped three ways, rigid tape changed the height of the arch and both placebo tape and kinesiology tape left it where it was (Kim and Park, 2017). Our shin splints program is about training load, which is where this injury actually lives.

For the low back, the evidence is weak and the national guideline is silent. A systematic review of 9 randomized trials in chronic nonspecific low back pain reported a reduction in pain intensity straight after application, a standardized difference of -0.47 (-0.93 to -0.02, p = 0.04), and no significant difference for disability, trunk flexion range, fear of movement or trunk muscle endurance; its search ran only to January 2018, which is a real limit on a paper published in 2023 (Pan and colleagues, 2023). The NICE guideline for low back pain and sciatica does not mention taping in either direction, so there is no national recommendation to point to here, for it or against it. Our low back pain program sets out what the same guideline does recommend, and sciatica covers leg pain coming from the back, which is a different problem that tape has never been shown to touch.

Why does sham tape keep matching the real thing?

The review that gave this page its shape has a title that is also its conclusion: current evidence does not support the use of this tape in clinical practice. It was published in the Journal of Physiotherapy, which is physiotherapy's own journal, and it pooled 12 randomized trials in 495 participants: 3 in knee pain, 3 in neck pain, 2 in shoulder pain, 2 in chronic low back pain, 1 in plantar fasciitis and 1 across mixed musculoskeletal conditions. Mean methodological quality was 6.1 out of 10 on the PEDro scale. Overall, the tape was no better than sham taping, placebo, or the active treatments it was set against, and where it did come out ahead the effects were small, probably not clinically meaningful, or came from low quality trials (Parreira and colleagues, 2014).

A meta-analysis published the same year reached the same conclusion from a different angle. Across 13 articles at level II evidence or better, published between 2003 and 2013, the authors concluded that the tape may have limited potential to reduce pain in musculoskeletal injury, that depending on the condition that reduction may not be clinically meaningful, and that taping did not reduce pain beyond the other treatments it was compared with (Montalvo and colleagues, 2014).

A more recent comparison points the same way. When tape was set head to head against shockwave therapy across 15 randomized trials in 907 people, there was no significant difference between them in the short term for pain, function or strength, and in the medium term shockwave pulled ahead on both pain and function. The certainty of evidence for every outcome in that review was very low (Hesham Sallam and colleagues, 2026). Our page on shockwave therapy for plantar fasciitis covers what that machine does and does not do, and the short version is that losing a comparison to it is not a strong position.

None of that makes the relief imaginary. People in these trials genuinely felt better, including the ones wearing the fake version. What it means is that the specific application, the direction of pull, the tension and the pattern, which is the part a course teaches and a clinic charges for, is the part nobody has managed to isolate. Tape in the first week of a sore heel is a reasonable thing to do. A course of appointments to have it reapplied by an expert is a harder thing to justify.

What a regulator decided when it read the evidence

In 2012 the UK Advertising Standards Authority ruled on a website that promoted kinesiology taping and offered taping services. The site said the technique aided the lymphatic and muscle systems, substantially reduced recovery times, encouraged lymphatic fluid to move from areas of high pressure to low pressure toward working lymph nodes, relieved pain, supported muscles in movement, removed lymphatic fluid congestion, corrected joint misalignment and assisted a weak muscle. It listed 34 conditions the tape could assist with. All four challenged claims were upheld on 11 July 2012.

What makes the ruling worth reading is the part about the evidence, because the regulator was not dismissing the tape out of hand. The advertiser supplied 23 reports on the first issue alone. One concerned a different type of tape, one was an unsigned and unapproved master's dissertation, and one was a study of taping in animals, again with a different tape.

Ten were case studies of between one and six people, none of them controlled trials, and five of those ten used tape alongside other treatments, so no effect could be attributed to the tape. Ten were clinical trials, and their weaknesses included having no sham tape control, no randomization or blinding, small samples, short follow-up, and no assessment of the mechanism of action. One of those ten never arrived in full, so the regulator had a summary of it and nothing else.

That is a regulator independently arriving at the same reading as the systematic reviews, in 2012, working from the advertiser's own best evidence. The ASA's own current guidance for marketers, dated 8 March 2021, records the ruling and the conditions it covered, including lymphedema, sports injuries, tension headaches, whiplash, sciatica, and post-operative or traumatic edema, and says the evidence submitted was "not considered to be sufficiently robust". It advises marketers to avoid efficacy claims of that kind unless they hold strong evidence for them.

One point of confusion to clear, because the regulator's guidance flags it too: kinesiology the complementary therapy and kinesiology taping are similarly named and unrelated. Nothing on this page is about the therapy.

The lymphatic drainage claim

This is the claim with the longest reach and the thinnest support, and it is the one the 2012 ruling turned on. The tape is widely sold as a way to move lymphatic fluid, and the population in which that has actually been tested is women with lymphedema after breast cancer treatment.

Three syntheses have looked. A 2023 review of 7 randomized trials, drawn from 123 eligible documents, concluded that taping did not significantly reduce upper limb volume, and described the evidence as little and of low quality (Marotta and colleagues, 2023). A 2025 review of 8 studies from 608 search results concluded that the evidence supporting the tape for breast cancer related lymphedema is modest and that further prospective studies are needed (Skwiot, 2025).

Neither of those two pooled its trials, and both read warmer in their results than in their own conclusions: the 2023 one says taping might have a positive effect on limb volume before concluding that it did not significantly reduce it, and the 2025 one lists positive effects on circumference, pain, range and function before calling the evidence modest. So the figure worth holding on to comes from the third. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of bandaging techniques pooled 5 trials in 239 women and found no significant difference in reduction of affected arm volume between any of them, kinesiology taping, multilayer and cohesive bandaging included, with a standardized mean difference of -0.04 (95% confidence interval -0.30 to 0.21, p = 0.750, heterogeneity 0%), drawn from a wider review of 21 trials in 1,122 women (Garcia-Chico and colleagues, 2025).

Notice what those three studies have in common besides the result. All of them are about a supervised cancer rehabilitation population, taped as part of a treatment program by a clinician trained in it. That is a long way from somebody buying a roll in a pharmacy and following a video for a swollen ankle, and the distance is the point.

If you have lymphedema, or have had lymph nodes removed, do not tape the affected limb from a video. Your lymphedema service is the right place for any compression or taping decision, because the wrong garment or the wrong application can make swelling worse, and because the limb needs watching for signs that are easy to miss. The same caution applies before you tape that limb or begin any exercise program for it. New swelling that nobody has checked yet needs a doctor's assessment before you start, and the same day if it is in one arm or leg and you do not know the cause, or it is severe, painful or came on very suddenly. Call emergency services if swelling comes with shortness of breath, a chest that feels tight, heavy or painful, coughing up blood, a pounding heartbeat, or feeling lightheaded, faint, confused, sick or clammy. Sudden shortness of breath, chest pain or coughing up blood also needs emergency services when the swelling looks no different, as these can be signs of a blood clot in the lungs.

Watch the swollen area for signs of a skin infection (cellulitis), which the NHS says often affects people with lymphedema. If the skin there becomes painful, hot or swollen, or turns red or darker than usual, get medical advice the same day, as early treatment can stop it becoming more serious. Do the same for a high temperature, or if you feel hot, cold or shivery. If the skin changes come with a very high temperature or feeling hot, cold or shivery, a fast heartbeat or fast breathing, purple patches on the skin, feeling dizzy or faint, confusion, or cold, clammy or pale skin, or you feel very unwell, call emergency services or go to an emergency department straight away, and do not drive yourself.

How long to leave it on, and getting it off without tearing your skin

Nobody has tested the best wear time, so the answer comes from what the trials happened to do. The plantar fasciitis study kept one application on for up to 5 days and measured pain daily through it, and its authors were comfortable with that length (Garcia-Gomariz and colleagues, 2024). Working to 2 to 5 days per application and reapplying only while it is still helping is reasonable, and your physio will adjust this for your skin and your activity.

A better rule than any number is to let the skin set the limit. Take the tape off early if the area under it itches, stings, reddens, blisters or feels sore in a new way, and do not reapply to the same patch of skin until it looks normal again. Rolled, grubby edges that catch on clothing are a reason to replace a strip rather than press it back down.

How much harm these strips do is genuinely not known, which is worth saying plainly. The Cochrane reviewers could not produce a reliable estimate of adverse events because the trials reported them too differently from each other (Gianola and colleagues, 2021). The one summary that puts a word to it, an Australian entry on taping for knee osteoarthritis, which is about rigid tape pulled across the kneecap rather than the elastic kind, calls the adverse effects negligible and generally limited to minor skin irritation (HANDI Project Team, 2013). Negligible on average is not the same as negligible for your skin, which is the reason the paragraph above is about watching it rather than about a number.

Taking it off is the part that catches people, and no study on this page describes how to do it, so what follows is ordinary practice with adhesive dressings rather than a trial finding. Wet the tape first, in the shower or with a little oil, and give it a minute. Then peel it back on itself, flat along the skin, rather than lifting it up and away at a right angle, and hold the skin down just ahead of the edge with your other hand as you go. Working in the direction the hair grows hurts considerably less than working against it.

Stop pulling if a strip has lifted or torn the skin, if the skin underneath is already broken or inflamed, or if the area is numb. In those situations the tape comes off with help rather than with persistence, and a torn patch of skin on a foot that cannot feel it is the beginning of a problem rather than the end of one. Wherever it happens, watch that patch for the infection signs in the warning list below.

When tape becomes the problem

The tape itself is low risk. What people do while wearing it is not.

Tape that makes a painful thing tolerable lets you keep loading an injury that needed less load. That is the mechanism by which a cheap roll of cotton causes expensive damage: not through the skin, but through a tendon that gets three more weeks of running because the first mile stopped hurting. The relief is short term and the tissue change is not, so taping up to get through sessions that were already too much is the one use of it worth arguing against. Our pain monitoring model guide has the next-morning check for judging that, and it reads the same whether the part is taped or not.

Skin comes next, and none of what follows comes from a tape trial: it is ordinary caution about fragile skin. Thin, fragile or diabetic skin, skin with poor circulation, and any skin that is broken, infected, sunburned or newly scarred are all reasons to leave tape off or ask first. Skin in or just out of a radiotherapy treatment area belongs on that list: the NHS says radiotherapy can leave skin sore, dry, itchy, blistered or peeling, that this usually settles within 2 to 4 weeks of treatment finishing, and that tight bands, ties and straps over the sore area are to be avoided, so the radiotherapy team is the place to ask about tape (NHS, radiotherapy side effects).

Reduced feeling is the firmest of those reasons: taping a foot that has reduced feeling is not advisable at all, because you will not feel a rub or a pressure mark forming underneath it. That holds whatever the cause of the numbness, and the warning list below sets out what a new blister, sore or color change on a numb foot needs and how fast.

Two things the skin can do are worth separating. Irritation from a strip pulling or rubbing settles once the tape is off. A reaction to the adhesive itself behaves differently: within hours or days the skin under the strip becomes itchy, blistered, dry or cracked, and turns red on lighter skin or dark brown, purple or gray on darker skin (NHS, contact dermatitis). Take the tape off, do not put another strip on that patch of skin, and ask a pharmacist what to put on it, then see a doctor if it is severe, keeps coming back or does not settle. A serious allergic reaction to an adhesive is rare, and the warning list below gives its signs and the one instruction that matters, which is to call emergency services rather than wait and see.

One way of applying it is worth ruling out. Do not run a strip all the way around a limb, a finger or a toe. The tape stretches, the part underneath can swell, and a band that circles it can tighten on it. If the fingers or toes beyond a strip tingle, go numb, or turn cold, pale or blue, take the tape off at once. If feeling and color do not come back quickly, call emergency services or go to an emergency department straight away, and do not drive yourself.

A swollen, warm, tender calf or thigh is not something to tape. It needs assessing the same day, because one of the things it can be is a blood clot, and the warning list below gives the full set of signs and what to do about each. The same applies to new swelling in one limb that nobody has looked at yet, as the lymphedema section above explains.

People ask about pregnancy often enough to answer, and the answer is that there is nothing to report. No trial on this page studied taping in pregnancy, and the same goes for the abdominal separation that people search for alongside it, so this page cannot tell you whether it helps. Taping in pregnancy, and taping an abdominal wall after birth, are questions for your own midwife or physiotherapist, who can see the skin and the belly in question. For what the evidence does support after a birth, our page on diastasis recti is the place to start.

Where tape fits beside the loading work

A strip of tape changes the next few days. Loading changes the next few months, and nothing on this page competes with that.

Every guideline that supports taping supports it in the same shape, as something used alongside the rest of the treatment and for short-term relief. The heel pain guideline says it in those words (Koc and colleagues, 2023). In the shoulder meta-analysis, tape plus other treatment beat tape used alone (Wang and colleagues, 2026), and the patellofemoral review found the benefit strongest where taping was added to exercise (Khan and colleagues, 2026). Nobody who has looked at this carefully recommends tape as the treatment, and that consistency is more informative than any single effect size.

So if you have a roll in a drawer, use it for the match you have decided to play, the long day on your feet, or the first couple of weeks of a sore heel. Not for the session you have already been told to skip, and not for getting through pain that is building week on week, which is the one use of it with a real cost. Then be honest about what it did. Two weeks is long enough to tell: if the part you taped is no easier at the thing you taped it for, you have your answer, and the load is where the attention goes instead. TENS machines for back pain and massage guns are two more things people buy for pain, and both of those pages go through the trials the same way.

When to see a physio (physical therapist)

If the thing you are taping has not been assessed, that is the appointment to make. Tape over an unexamined knee, heel or shoulder is a guess with adhesive on it, and an assessment answers the two questions tape cannot: which tissue is actually sore, and how much load it will take this week.

Book sooner if the pain wakes you at night, if a limb is numb, weak or getting weaker, if a calf is swollen or warm, if you have diabetes or reduced feeling in your feet and any new foot problem, or if you have lymphedema and new swelling. Several of those are not a physio's job first, and the warning list below says who to call and how quickly.

Common questions

References

1. Parreira Pdo CS, Costa Lda CM, Hespanhol LC Jr, Lopes AD, Costa LOP. Current evidence does not support the use of Kinesio Taping in clinical practice: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2014;60(1):31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.008
2. Montalvo AM, Cara EL, Myer GD. Effect of kinesiology taping on pain in individuals with musculoskeletal injuries: systematic review and meta-analysis. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2014;42(2):48-57. https://doi.org/10.3810/psm.2014.05.2057
3. Gianola S, Iannicelli V, Fascio E, Andreano A, Li LC, Valsecchi MG, Moja L, Castellini G. Kinesio taping for rotator cuff disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021;8:CD012720. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012720.pub2
4. Aldalati AY, Hussein AM, Hammadeh BM, Alrabadi B, Albliwi M, Abuassi M. Effectiveness of Kinesio taping without physical therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology International. 2025;45(5):99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05853-z
5. Khan AU, Kumar S, Sehgal CA, Akhtar K. Effect of taping on pain and function in athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy. 2026;34(5):401-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2601586
6. Garcia-Gomariz C, Garcia-Martinez MT, Alcahuz-Grinan M, Hernandez-Guillen D, Blasco JM. Effects on pain of kinesiology tape in patients with plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2024;46(23):5490-5496. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304645
7. Koc TA Jr, Bise CG, Neville C, et al. Heel Pain - Plantar Fasciitis: Revision 2023. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2023;53(12):CPG1-CPG39. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.0303
8. Lucado AM, Day JM, Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, Fedorczyk J, Grewal R, Martin RL. Lateral Elbow Pain and Muscle Function Impairments: Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 2022;52(12):CPG1-CPG111. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2022.0302
9. Zhong Y, Zheng C, Zheng J, Xu S. Kinesio tape reduces pain in patients with lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Surgery. 2020;76:190-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.044
10. Lin J, Zhu H. An invited commentary on "Kinesio tape reduces pain in patients with lateral epicondylitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials": is Kinesio taping more than a placebo in lateral epicondylitis? International Journal of Surgery. 2020;77:145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.057
11. Ouyang C, You Q, Yang C, Yu D. Time-dependent comparative efficacy of non-surgical treatments for pain relief in lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Physiology. 2026;17:1782562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2026.1782562
12. Wang J, Li S, Lin Q, Yin Y. Effect of kinesio taping on shoulder tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Hand Therapy. Published online 21 September 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2026.06.022
13. Wang Y, Li X, Sun C, Xu R. Effectiveness of kinesiology taping on the functions of upper limbs in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized trial. Neurological Sciences. 2022;43(7):4145-4156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06010-1
14. Guo S, Liu P, Feng B, Xu Y, Wang Y. Efficacy of kinesiology taping on the management of shin splints: a systematic review. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2022;50(5):369-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2021.1949253
15. Griebert MC, Needle AR, McConnell J, Kaminski TW. Lower-leg Kinesio tape reduces rate of loading in participants with medial tibial stress syndrome. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2016;18:62-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.01.001
16. Kachanathu SJ, Algarni FS, Nuhmani S, Alenazi AM, Hafez AR, Algarni AD. Functional outcomes of kinesio taping versus standard orthotics in the management of shin splint. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 2018;58(11):1666-1670. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07520-X
17. Kim T, Park JC. Short-term effects of sports taping on navicular height, navicular drop and peak plantar pressure in healthy elite athletes: a within-subject comparison. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(46):e8714. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008714
18. Pan L, Li Y, Gao L, Sun Y, Li M, Zhang X, Wang Y, Shi B. Effects of Kinesio taping for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. 2023;29(6):68-76. PMID 37171950. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37171950/
19. Hesham Sallam M, Shafiek Mustafa Saleh M, Samy H, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus Kinesio taping in treating musculoskeletal disorders: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2026;39(2):410-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251384096
20. Skwiot M. Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping for lymphedema in the post-mastectomy patient: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14(5):1700. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051700
21. Marotta N, Lippi L, Ammendolia V, Calafiore D, Inzitari MT, Pinto M, Invernizzi M, de Sire A. Efficacy of kinesio taping on upper limb volume reduction in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2023;59(2):237-247. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07752-3
22. Garcia-Chico C, Lopez-Ortiz S, Lorenzo-Crespo C, Pinto-Fraga J, Santos-Lozano A, Dominguez-Garcia A. Wrapping up the evidence: bandaging in breast cancer-related lymphedema, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer (Tokyo). 2025;32(4):654-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01693-8
23. Handbook of Non Drug Intervention (HANDI) Project Team. Taping for knee osteoarthritis. Australian Family Physician. 2013;42(10):725-726. PMID 24130976. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24130976/
24. Advertising Standards Authority. ASA ruling on LimbVolume Ltd, reference A11-165319, website www.kinesiotaping.co.uk. Upheld on all four issues, 11 July 2012. Read 22 October 2026. https://asa.org.uk/rulings/LimbVolume-Ltd-A11-165319.html
25. Advertising Standards Authority and Committee of Advertising Practice. AdviceOnline: Health, kinesiology and kinesiology taping. Dated 8 March 2021. Read 22 October 2026. https://www.asa.org.uk/advice-online/health-kinesiology.html
26. de Vries A, Zwerver J, Diercks R, Tak I, van Berkel S, van Cingel R, van der Worp H, van den Akker-Scheek I. Effect of patellar strap and sports tape on pain in patellar tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2016;26(10):1217-1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12556
27. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management. NICE guideline NG59. Published 30 November 2016. Read 22 October 2026. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59
28. NHS. Cellulitis. Page last reviewed 18 April 2024. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cellulitis/
29. NHS. Anaphylaxis. Page last reviewed 21 June 2023. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/anaphylaxis/
30. NHS. Contact dermatitis. Page last reviewed 3 May 2023. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/contact-dermatitis/
31. NHS. Radiotherapy: side effects. Page last reviewed 5 June 2023. https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/radiotherapy/side-effects/

Written and checked by the PocketPhysio editorial team. Last updated 2026-10-22.

This page is general education, not a diagnosis or a personal treatment plan. See a physiotherapist or doctor for advice about your own situation.